Skip to content

What do YOU think?

The city is working to assume ownership of the old armoury site. What should the property be used for?

Trevor Miller
I agree with Mayor Fontaine on this issue. I’d like to see some sort of business move into the old armoury site as well, but I’m not sure what sort of business would suit the property as is.
If it came to it, tearing the building down to make way for something else might be the practical answer to the issue, though it would be nice to keep the building as it is something of a landmark.
If it was feasible, I would love to see something like the Habitat for Humanity ReStore on a larger scale, though I’m not sure that would generate the revenues the city is hoping for out of the property.

Doreen Murray
I am encouraged by Mr. Fontaine’s idea of attracting a business to the old armoury site. The location certainly lends itself to such a plan.
In order to draw consumers and possible new inhabitants to our area, one must  have something to offer them.
Business cannot only offer jobs, but will generate much spinoff spending in our community, so the larger the business, the better.
Would an upscale seniors housing complex containing a proper refit centre and stores work here? That too could well attract more inhabitants to our community.
Any of the above would provide the rejuvenation Flin Flon needs at this time.

Ken Mansell
This would be an ideal location for a new business in Flin Flon.
My wish list includes Tim Hortons, Bonanza, A&W, Boston Pizza and Target.
However, I think most of these or their facsimiles are a long shot at best. A car lot may be more realistic.
I think Mayor Fontaine is right in wanting to attract a taxpaying enterprise.
The city may have to make concessions to attract them, though. We are not in a strong position to make strong demands.
Look what happened to The Pas when Canadian Tire  sidelined them in favour of Flin Flon.

push icon
Be the first to read breaking stories. Enable push notifications on your device. Disable anytime.
No thanks