Letter to the Editor: Designated graffiti areas should be considered

Dear Editor,

In regard to the graffiti issue, discussed in the Editor’s View in the May 30 issue of The Reminder, I am wondering if a compromise might be an option.

article continues below

In other areas and provinces in our beautiful country, rock “art” has been designated to certain areas. This allows for both the painters and others who prefer natural beauty appeasement.

Economically, this seems an idea worth considering, as many of our tourists may have decided to visit our lovely unspoiled area and may be hoping to leave the urban graffiti behind. As well, the many local citizens who appreciate the natural beauty of our country are recognized. At the very least, possibly an outright ban could be enacted and enforced in the parks and campgrounds, and let the rest of the rocks on the highway be open to all, as seems to be the case. But, does anyone really care if Jane loves Jack? And if that ended up being painted over a truly historic Indigenous rock drawing, that would be a real shame wouldn’t it?

Heather Hammond

Flin Flon

© Copyright Flin Flon Reminder


NOTE: To post a comment you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Google+ You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

The Flin Flon Reminder welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

comments powered by Disqus

Summer cautions POLL

How have you been spending the summer during COVID-19?

or  view results