Skip to content

Calling the U.S. bluff

The Reminder is making its archives back to 2003 available on our website. Please note that, due to technical limitations, archive articles are presented without the usual formatting.

The Reminder is making its archives back to 2003 available on our website. Please note that, due to technical limitations, archive articles are presented without the usual formatting.

The Iranians have clearly concluded that all the American and Israeli threats to attack them are mere bluff. Israel could not destroy all of IranÕs nuclear facilities unless it was willing to drop large numbers of nuclear weapons. The United States could do the job using only conventional weapons, but in reply Iran could close the Gulf to tanker traffic and cause a global economic crisis. So the U.S. and Israel must be bluffing, unless they are crazy. This explains the bravado of IranÕs little propaganda show on July 9, when it test-launched a number of ballistic missiles, including one that has the ability to carry a nuclear weapon and the range to strike Israel. This elicited the usual veiled threats of an attack on Iran from both Washington and Jerusalem, but the Iranians donÕt believe them any more. The Shahab-3 missile that the Iranians tested has flown before, and it could indeed reach Israel. However, it lacks a proper guidance system, and probably could not penetrate IsraelÕs anti-ballistic missile defences. More importantly, as the U.S. National Intelligence Estimate of last December affirmed, Iran has no nuclear weapons, and closed down its program to develop a nuclear weapons capability in 2003. The main purpose of the tests was to strengthen the position of hard-liners in domestic Iranian politics. The Iranian Revolutionary Guards, the organization that carried them out, wants to keep the confrontation with the U.S. and its allies alive because it fears that other elements in the regime might bargain away IranÕs right to enrich nuclear fuel for civilian use. If neither the U.S. or Israel intends to attack Iran, this is a cost-free strategy: you win the domestic political struggle and nothing bad happens to you internationally. If you miscalculate, however, you get a war out of it. What are the odds that the Iranians are miscalculating? President George W. Bush seems to have convinced himself that something must be done about the ÒIranian threatÓ before he goes, but he faces the almost unanimous opposition of the U.S. military and intelligence establishment. Last DecemberÕs National Intelligence Estimate was a deliberate attempt to undercut the Bush administrationÕs relentless propaganda about the ÒIranian nuclear threat.Ó Prime Minister Ehud OlmertÕs coalition government in Israel might collapse if he chose to attack Iran alone, and the Israeli military are clearly divided on the feasibility of such an attack. Besides, Israel could not do such a thing without WashingtonÕs approval Ð Israeli aircraft would have to fly through Iraqi airspace, which is under U.S. control Ð so it all comes back to what Bush decides. He probably doesnÕt know himself yet, and his main concern must be that senior soldiers and spies in Washington would go public to oppose such an adventure. To predict what may happen next, let us use an exercise called Setting the Odds. Over dinner recently, I offered my family, well versed in such topics, two-to-one odds that neither the U.S. nor Israel would attack Iran this year, and they laughed. Their response was the same at odds of four-to-one. At six-to-one one showed a mild interest, but still declined the offer. From which I deduce that for all the huffing and puffing in Washington and Jerusalem, an actual attack on Iran this year is extremely unlikely. The Revolutionary Guards are right. You may object that my dinnertime technique lacks scientific rigour. I would reply that so does everybody elseÕs. Moreover, our family has a good track record, mainly because we assume that while individual leaders may lose the plot, large institutions like governments and armed forces are generally more rational in their choices. Some people in the White House have convinced themselves that the Iranian people will rise up and overthrow their government as soon as the first American bombs fall, but the professional soldiers in the Pentagon donÕt believe in fairy tales. Six-to-one says that there will be no U.S. or Israeli attack on Iran this year.

push icon
Be the first to read breaking stories. Enable push notifications on your device. Disable anytime.
No thanks